<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Explaining Linux Security</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ratliff.net/blog/2009/04/14/explaining-linux-security/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ratliff.net/blog/2009/04/14/explaining-linux-security/</link>
	<description>A blog about open source and security and open source security</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 15:12:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://www.ratliff.net/blog/2009/04/14/explaining-linux-security/comment-page-1/#comment-3765</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 13:11:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ratliff.net/blog/?p=143#comment-3765</guid>
		<description>Perfect and to the point!  Linux (actually any *nix) security has always been a bit of a dark art.  There are documents (policies) that describe how to harden or minimize your attack footprint. Every IT organization needs to conform to some security policy.  Examples are NIST 800-53, DISA Unix STIGs, Center for Internet Security, DCID 6/3, SANS LAMP and 20 Critical Security Controls and many more.  As Doc mentioned, you shouldn’t need to understand the science in order to use it.  Security should be easy—like turning a key or pushing a button—in order to use it.

Security Blanket by Trusted Computer Solutions strives to be that button.  The product is feature rich and easy to use.  There is a free trial and the development staff has built a how-to blog at http://tcs-security-blanket.blogspot.com/  The product is available for z series computing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perfect and to the point!  Linux (actually any *nix) security has always been a bit of a dark art.  There are documents (policies) that describe how to harden or minimize your attack footprint. Every IT organization needs to conform to some security policy.  Examples are NIST 800-53, DISA Unix STIGs, Center for Internet Security, DCID 6/3, SANS LAMP and 20 Critical Security Controls and many more.  As Doc mentioned, you shouldn’t need to understand the science in order to use it.  Security should be easy—like turning a key or pushing a button—in order to use it.</p>
<p>Security Blanket by Trusted Computer Solutions strives to be that button.  The product is feature rich and easy to use.  There is a free trial and the development staff has built a how-to blog at <a href="http://tcs-security-blanket.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">http://tcs-security-blanket.blogspot.com/</a>  The product is available for z series computing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Open Source Security » Blog Archive » Explaining Linux Security &#124; Linux Affinity</title>
		<link>http://www.ratliff.net/blog/2009/04/14/explaining-linux-security/comment-page-1/#comment-3645</link>
		<dc:creator>Open Source Security » Blog Archive » Explaining Linux Security &#124; Linux Affinity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 03:47:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ratliff.net/blog/?p=143#comment-3645</guid>
		<description>[...] more here: Open Source Security » Blog Archive » Explaining Linux Security      Posted in: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] more here: Open Source Security » Blog Archive » Explaining Linux Security      Posted in: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://www.ratliff.net/blog/2009/04/14/explaining-linux-security/comment-page-1/#comment-3627</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 15:41:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ratliff.net/blog/?p=143#comment-3627</guid>
		<description>We all know there is only one use of the abbreviation MAC right? Media Access Control 8-) Um, tell me again why security is confusing for the beginner?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We all know there is only one use of the abbreviation MAC right? Media Access Control <img src='http://www.ratliff.net/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_cool.gif' alt='8-)' class='wp-smiley' /> Um, tell me again why security is confusing for the beginner?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doc Shankar</title>
		<link>http://www.ratliff.net/blog/2009/04/14/explaining-linux-security/comment-page-1/#comment-3624</link>
		<dc:creator>Doc Shankar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 20:24:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ratliff.net/blog/?p=143#comment-3624</guid>
		<description>The issue still is how can a user use MAC without knowing what it is!  This is still the problem with SELinux.  A majority of the folks attending the SELinux session last year at LWE said they had SELinux disbaled. 

They were looking for some kind of magic from IBM, which i didn&#039;t have! 

Imagine if i had to know about electromagnetics, to use a microwave oven! 

We need an AppArmor type interface with a powerful engine like SELinux!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The issue still is how can a user use MAC without knowing what it is!  This is still the problem with SELinux.  A majority of the folks attending the SELinux session last year at LWE said they had SELinux disbaled. </p>
<p>They were looking for some kind of magic from IBM, which i didn&#8217;t have! </p>
<p>Imagine if i had to know about electromagnetics, to use a microwave oven! </p>
<p>We need an AppArmor type interface with a powerful engine like SELinux!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
