<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Open Source Security</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ratliff.net/blog/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ratliff.net/blog</link>
	<description>A blog about open source and security and open source security</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 06:01:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Not with a bang, but a whimper by blogger &#187; Blog Archive &#187; No charges yet as grand jury investigates Palin hack</title>
		<link>http://www.ratliff.net/blog/2008/02/14/not-with-a-bang-but-a-whimper/#comment-3562</link>
		<dc:creator>blogger &#187; Blog Archive &#187; No charges yet as grand jury investigates Palin hack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 06:34:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ratliff.net/blog/index.php/2008/02/14/not-with-a-bang-but-a-whimper/#comment-3562</guid>
		<description>[...] detailing disputes over control of OpenSolaris and the Sun-driven OpenDS directory projects, from February 2008 and November 2007. Sun declined to comment on the specifics of these issues and noted they both [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] detailing disputes over control of OpenSolaris and the Sun-driven OpenDS directory projects, from February 2008 and November 2007. Sun declined to comment on the specifics of these issues and noted they both [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Not with a bang, but a whimper by Is Sun Solaris on its deathbed? &#124; CHARGED's 24/7 News Aggregator</title>
		<link>http://www.ratliff.net/blog/2008/02/14/not-with-a-bang-but-a-whimper/#comment-3560</link>
		<dc:creator>Is Sun Solaris on its deathbed? &#124; CHARGED's 24/7 News Aggregator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 21:40:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ratliff.net/blog/index.php/2008/02/14/not-with-a-bang-but-a-whimper/#comment-3560</guid>
		<description>[...] detailing disputes over control of OpenSolaris and the Sun-driven OpenDS directory projects, from February 2008 and November 2007. Sun declined to comment on the specifics of these issues and noted they both [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] detailing disputes over control of OpenSolaris and the Sun-driven OpenDS directory projects, from February 2008 and November 2007. Sun declined to comment on the specifics of these issues and noted they both [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Not with a bang, but a whimper by Is Sun Solaris on its deathbed? (InfoWorld) &#124; Latest Breaking News Trends</title>
		<link>http://www.ratliff.net/blog/2008/02/14/not-with-a-bang-but-a-whimper/#comment-3558</link>
		<dc:creator>Is Sun Solaris on its deathbed? (InfoWorld) &#124; Latest Breaking News Trends</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 14:20:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ratliff.net/blog/index.php/2008/02/14/not-with-a-bang-but-a-whimper/#comment-3558</guid>
		<description>[...] detailing disputes over control of OpenSolaris and the Sun-driven OpenDS directory projects, from February 2008 and November 2007. Sun declined to comment on the specifics of these issues and noted they both [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] detailing disputes over control of OpenSolaris and the Sun-driven OpenDS directory projects, from February 2008 and November 2007. Sun declined to comment on the specifics of these issues and noted they both [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Not with a bang, but a whimper by Is Sun Solaris on its deathbed? &#124; TechHairBall.com</title>
		<link>http://www.ratliff.net/blog/2008/02/14/not-with-a-bang-but-a-whimper/#comment-3557</link>
		<dc:creator>Is Sun Solaris on its deathbed? &#124; TechHairBall.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 11:01:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ratliff.net/blog/index.php/2008/02/14/not-with-a-bang-but-a-whimper/#comment-3557</guid>
		<description>[...] detailing disputes over control of OpenSolaris and the Sun-driven OpenDS directory projects, from February 2008 and November 2007. Sun declined to comment on the specifics of these issues and noted they both [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] detailing disputes over control of OpenSolaris and the Sun-driven OpenDS directory projects, from February 2008 and November 2007. Sun declined to comment on the specifics of these issues and noted they both [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5.2 contains two security Technology Previews by Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5.2 contains two security Technology Previews</title>
		<link>http://www.ratliff.net/blog/2008/05/21/red-hat-enterprise-linux-52-contains-two-security-technology-previews/#comment-3494</link>
		<dc:creator>Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5.2 contains two security Technology Previews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 01:37:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ratliff.net/blog/?p=72#comment-3494</guid>
		<description>[...] Go to the author&#8217;s original blog: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5.2 contains two security Technology Previews [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Go to the author&#8217;s original blog: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5.2 contains two security Technology Previews [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on IBM to contribute to Mifos by Vamsi</title>
		<link>http://www.ratliff.net/blog/2007/11/29/ibm-to-contribute-to-mifos/#comment-3489</link>
		<dc:creator>Vamsi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 05:15:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ratliff.net/blog/index.php/2007/11/29/ibm-to-contribute-to-mifos/#comment-3489</guid>
		<description>Hi,
i'm wrking on mifos from past couple of days, i completed installation of mifos and it is working properly in local system, but i need to upload the mifos with sql database in to server.But after uploding in to server itz giving an error that "Your database is to old version ".So what i should do to slove this problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,<br />
i&#8217;m wrking on mifos from past couple of days, i completed installation of mifos and it is working properly in local system, but i need to upload the mifos with sql database in to server.But after uploding in to server itz giving an error that &#8220;Your database is to old version &#8220;.So what i should do to slove this problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Not with a bang, but a whimper by links for 2008-05-06 &#124; Paranoid</title>
		<link>http://www.ratliff.net/blog/2008/02/14/not-with-a-bang-but-a-whimper/#comment-3475</link>
		<dc:creator>links for 2008-05-06 &#124; Paranoid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 12:36:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ratliff.net/blog/index.php/2008/02/14/not-with-a-bang-but-a-whimper/#comment-3475</guid>
		<description>[...] Open Source Security » Blog Archive » Not with a bang, but a whimper Linus gets more patches while he is brushing his teeth than OpenSolaris gets in a week.???? (tags: open-solaris linux) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Open Source Security » Blog Archive » Not with a bang, but a whimper Linus gets more patches while he is brushing his teeth than OpenSolaris gets in a week.???? (tags: open-solaris linux) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Not with a bang, but a whimper by Have you ever kissed a girl? &#187; Snoopy&#8217;s Home</title>
		<link>http://www.ratliff.net/blog/2008/02/14/not-with-a-bang-but-a-whimper/#comment-3468</link>
		<dc:creator>Have you ever kissed a girl? &#187; Snoopy&#8217;s Home</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 01:55:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ratliff.net/blog/index.php/2008/02/14/not-with-a-bang-but-a-whimper/#comment-3468</guid>
		<description>[...] source camp, instead it&#8217;s more like they just want to take some advantage. OpenSolaris is slow in development progress, and there are complains. For MySQL, they announed some of the new features [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] source camp, instead it&#8217;s more like they just want to take some advantage. OpenSolaris is slow in development progress, and there are complains. For MySQL, they announed some of the new features [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Not with a bang, but a whimper by Thoughts by Ted &#187; Blog Archive &#187; What Sun was trying to do with Open Solaris</title>
		<link>http://www.ratliff.net/blog/2008/02/14/not-with-a-bang-but-a-whimper/#comment-3467</link>
		<dc:creator>Thoughts by Ted &#187; Blog Archive &#187; What Sun was trying to do with Open Solaris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 14:18:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ratliff.net/blog/index.php/2008/02/14/not-with-a-bang-but-a-whimper/#comment-3467</guid>
		<description>[...] So that explains why it&#8217;s take three long years to try to get basic open source development tools (such as putting Open Solaris source code in a distributed SCM located outside of the Sun firewall) for Open Solaris. It was never was Sun&#8217;s intention to try to promote a kernel engineering community, or at least, it was certainly not a high priority for them to do so. This can be shown by the fact that as of this writing they still are using the incredibly clunky requestor/sponsor system for getting patches into Solaris; setting up a git or mercurial servier is not rocket science. This lack is why Linux gets more contributions while brushing his teeth than Open Solaris gets in a week. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] So that explains why it&#8217;s take three long years to try to get basic open source development tools (such as putting Open Solaris source code in a distributed SCM located outside of the Sun firewall) for Open Solaris. It was never was Sun&#8217;s intention to try to promote a kernel engineering community, or at least, it was certainly not a high priority for them to do so. This can be shown by the fact that as of this writing they still are using the incredibly clunky requestor/sponsor system for getting patches into Solaris; setting up a git or mercurial servier is not rocket science. This lack is why Linux gets more contributions while brushing his teeth than Open Solaris gets in a week. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Not with a bang, but a whimper by Simon Phipps</title>
		<link>http://www.ratliff.net/blog/2008/02/14/not-with-a-bang-but-a-whimper/#comment-3273</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon Phipps</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 15:16:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ratliff.net/blog/index.php/2008/02/14/not-with-a-bang-but-a-whimper/#comment-3273</guid>
		<description>&#62; previous versions of documents (SCA and roadmap) just disappearing, 


Just so you know, I have now made sure that all previous versions of the SCA are available at http://www.sun.com/software/opensource/contributor_agreement.jsp</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt; previous versions of documents (SCA and roadmap) just disappearing, </p>
<p>Just so you know, I have now made sure that all previous versions of the SCA are available at <a href="http://www.sun.com/software/opensource/contributor_agreement.jsp" rel="nofollow">http://www.sun.com/software/opensource/contributor_agreement.jsp</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
